With these videos, some, in my opinion, had more of a clear thesis than others. With that said, not all of them supported their thesis with credible evidence to all views. Logical all are going to have different views and come across with their points. They threw out comparisons, analogies, as for metaphors. Some of the videos come with a more defensive when discussing the topic, all connect to the topic in different ways (Tomi Lauren Russian probe video, she seemed very frantic and didn't use any statistics in her argument)
. Now not all demonstrate respect for the multiple viewpoints. As are these sources credible or reliable well depends on how they view it will say if they are or not, regardless how confident they came across (Sandra Sanders would typically change the subject or disregard what the opponent was asking, yet had total confidence in herself making it sort of believable.). The tones of the videos you could say they are suitable for the points they want to throw across but not all will see it that way. The professional manner is presented some more polished than the others. Vivid examples were thrown yet not all of their audience will engage emotionally nor have their vision. Some of the people on the videos gave examples that anyone can relate but that doesn't mean all of us can still agree with their views. Overlaps on the videos showed how Logos, Pathos, and Ethos work together.
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/10/26/sarah-sanders-white-house-believes-muellers-trump-russia-will-be-closed-soon
No comments:
Post a Comment